Artificial neural network applications for optimizing water alternating gas injection: a comprehensive review

Adil Raad Saadallah Ogaidi; Xiao Wang; Mohammed A. Samba

doi:10.29047/01225383.1756

Adil Raad Saadallah Ogaidi Southwest Petroleum University , School of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Chengdu, 610500, China https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6445-0637
Xiao Wang Southwest Petroleum University , School of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Chengdu, 610500, China https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6666-2205
Mohammed A. Samba Sebha University , Petroleum Engineering Department, Libya https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8311-6380

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29047/01225383.1756

Keywords: Enhanced Oil Recovery, Water Alternating Gas, WAG Prediction Models, Artificial Neural Network, ANN Applications in WAG

Abstract References How to Cite Downloads

Abstract

The Water Alternating Gas (WAG) process is a cyclic method of injecting alternating cycles of gas followed by water, repeating this process over multiple cycles. However, decision-making during the WAG process often involves critical choices that, at times, fall short of providing accurate and effective results. In recent years, the advent of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) has opened up promising opportunities to revamp Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) processes.

This comprehensive review examines ANN-based methodologies for predicting performance of WAG injection projects. It starts with an overview of the WAG injection process, outlining its relevance in enhanced oil recovery. Subsequently, the study explores the architecture and complexity of ANNs, providing foundational insights into their functionality. The application of ANNs in developing predictive models for WAG injection is then analyzed, emphasizing their potential to enhance accuracy in forecasting WAG performance.

Key aspects discussed include ANN-based WAG injection across various gas and rock types, the functions used in ANN WAG modeling, and the algorithms employed in ANN-based WAG simulations. Furthermore, the review highlights the challenges associated to implementing ANN-based predictive models in WAG projects. By synthesizing existing research, this study intends to provide valuable insights for petroleum engineers, particularly in understanding and applying ANN models for optimizing WAG injection strategies.

References

Afzali, S. (2021). Mathematical modeling and simulation of water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection. Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Al-Haboobi, Z. I. M. (2019). Calibrating the Todd and Longstaff's mixing parameter value for miscible finite sized slug WAG injection for application and optimisation on a field scale. Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh, UK. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201900127

Al-Mudhafar, W. J., Rao, D. N., & McCreery, E. B. (2017). Evaluation of immiscible CO₂ enhance oil recovery through the CGI, WAG, and GAGD processes in South Rumaila oil field. In 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2017 (pp. 1–5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201701349

Al-Mudhafar, W. J., & Rao, D. (2017). Lessons learned from the field-scale simulation of the gas-assisted gravity drainage GAGD process in heterogeneous sandstone oil reservoirs. In SPE Western Regional Meeting (D031S006R002). SPE. https://doi.org/10.2118/185732-MS

Amar, M. N., Jahanbani Ghahfarokhi, A., Ng, C. S. W., & Zeraibi, N. (2021). Optimization of WAG in real geological field using rigorous soft computing techniques and nature-inspired algorithms. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 206, 109038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109038

Amar, M. N., Zeraibi, N., & Jahanbani Ghahfarokhi, A. (2020). Applying hybrid support vector regression and genetic algorithm to water alternating CO₂ gas EOR. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 10(3), 613–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1982

Ampomah, W., Acheampong, S. A., McMillan, M., Bratton, T., & El-Kaseeh, G. (2022). Development of a machine learning assisted framework in calibrating in-situ stress changes through time-lapse vertical seismic profiling. In Proceedings of the 16th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference (GHGT-16) (pp. 23–24). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4285741

Ampomah, W., Balch, R., Will, R., Cather, M., Gunda, D., & Dai, Z. (2017). Co-optimization of CO₂-EOR and storage processes under geological uncertainty. Energy Procedia, 114, 6928–6941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1835

Amr, H., El-Shafie, A., El Mazoghi, H., Shehata, A., & Taha, M. R. (2011). Artificial neural network technique for rainfall forecasting applied to Alexandria, Egypt. Int. J. Phys. Sci, 6(6), 1306–1316

Andersen, P. Ø., Nygård, J. I., & Kengessova, A. (2022). Prediction of oil recovery factor in stratified reservoirs after immiscible water-alternating gas injection based on PSO-, GSA-, GWO-, and GA-LSSVM. Energies, 15(2), 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020656

Arbib, M. A. (2003). The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3413.001.0001

Asante, J., Ampomah, W., Tu, J., & Cather, M. (2024). Data-driven modeling for forecasting oil recovery: A timeseries neural network approach for tertiary CO₂ WAG EOR. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 233, 212555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212555

Belazreg, L., & Mahmood, S. M. (2020). Water alternating gas incremental recovery factor prediction and WAG pilot lessons learned. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 10(2), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-019-0694-x

Belazreg, L., Mahmood, S. M., & Aulia, A. (2021). Fast and cost-effective mathematical models for hydrocarbon-immiscible water alternating gas incremental recovery factor prediction. ACS Omega, 6(27), 17492–17500. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c01901

Caudle, B. H., & Dyes, A. B. (1958). Improving miscible displacement by gas-water injection. Transactions of the AIME, 213(1), 281–283. https://doi.org/10.2118/911-G

Chen, L., et al. (2020). Application of artificial neural networks in CO₂ flooding scenario analysis. Energy & Fuels, 34(5), 625.

Christensen, J. R., Stenby, E. H., & Skauge, A. (2001). Review of WAG field experience. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 4(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.2118/71203-PA

Dharma, S., Hassan, M. H., Ong, H. C., Sebayang, A. H., Silitonga, A. S., Kusumo, F., & Milano, J. (2017). Experimental study and prediction of the performance and exhaust emissions of mixed Jatropha curcas–Ceiba pentandra biodiesel blends in diesel engine using artificial neural networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 618–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.065

Du, X., Salasakar, S., & Thakur, G. (2024). A comprehensive summary of the application of machine learning techniques for CO₂-enhanced oil recovery projects. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction. https://doi.org/10.3390/make6020043

Elsharafi, M. O. (2018). Literature review of water alternation gas injection. Journal of Earth Energy Engineering, 7(2), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.25299/jeee.2018.vol7(2).2117

Enab, K. A. (2018). Artificial neural network based design protocol for WAG implementation in CO₂ injection using fishbone wells in low permeability oil reservoirs.

Enab, K., & Ertekin, T. (2021). Screening and optimization of CO₂-WAG injection and fish-bone well structures in low permeability reservoirs using artificial neural network. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 200, 108268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108268

Ertekin, T., & Sun, Q. (2019). Artificial intelligence applications in reservoir engineering: A status check. Energies, 12(15), 2897. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12152897

Esene, C., Zendehboudi, S., Shiri, H., & Aborig, A. (2020). Deterministic tools to predict recovery performance of carbonated water injection. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 301, 111911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111911

Gao, M., Liu, Z., Qian, S., Liu, W., Li, W., Yin, H., & Cao, J. (2023). Machine-learning-based approach to optimize CO₂-WAG flooding in low permeability oil reservoirs. Energies, 16(17), 6149. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16176149.

Hasanzadeh, M., & Madani, M. (2024). Deterministic tools to predict gas assisted gravity drainage recovery factor. Energy Geoscience, 5(3), 100267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2023.100267

Hung, V. T. (2020). Integrated reservoir modelling workflow and optimization framework for CO₂ sequestration using water alternating gas process under geological uncertainties [Tesis, Kyushu University]. Kyushu University Institutional Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103208

Jaturakhanawanit, S., & Wannakomol, A. (2011). Water alternating gas injection for enhanced oil recovery in the Phitsanulok Basin. Suranaree Journal of Science & Technology, 18(4), 267

Kengessova, A. (2020). Prediction efficiency of immiscible water alternating gas performance by LSSVM-PSO algorithms [Tesis de maestría, University of Stavanger]. University of Stavanger, Norway.

Kenig, S., Ben-David, A., Omer, M., & Sadeh, A. (2001). Control of properties in injection molding by neural networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 14(6), 819–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-1976(02)00006-4

L Lv, W., Tian, W., Yang, Y., Yang, J., Dong, Z., Zhou, Y., & Li, W. (2021). Method for potential evaluation and parameter optimization for CO₂-WAG in low permeability reservoirs based on machine learning. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 651, p. 032038). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/651/3/032038

Ma, Jaehyun. (2010). Design of an Effective Water-Alternating-Gas (WAG) Injection Process Using Artificial Expert Systems.

Massoud, Mohammed Alsharif Emhemmed, Li, Yiqian, & Amar, Ibrahim A. (2022). Literature review of nanotechnology in the enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Engineering Research.

Nait Amar, M., Zeraibi, N., & Redouane, K. (2018). Optimization of WAG process using dynamic proxy, genetic algorithm and ant colony optimization. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 43(11), 6399–6412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3173-7

Negash, B. M., Tufa, L. D., & Ramasamy, M. (2018). System identification based proxy modeling of a reservoir under IWAG. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 458(1), 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/458/1/012055

Ogbeiwi, P., & Stephen, K. D. (2023). Optimising the value of a CO₂ water-alternating-gas injection project under geological and economic uncertainties using an improved artificial neural network. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31223/X5X95S

Qin, S., Li, J., Chen, J., Bi, X., & Xiang, H. (2023). Research on displacement efficiency by injecting CO₂ in shale reservoirs based on a genetic neural network model. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124812

Rahmanifard, H., & Plaksina, T. (2019). Application of artificial intelligence techniques in the petroleum industry: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 52(4), 2295–2318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9612-8

Samba, M. A., & Syihab, Z. (2014). Development of a predective model for EOR water alternating gas injection using proxy model derivided from artificial neural network model.

Samba, M. A., Aldokali, I., & Elsharaf, M. O. (2019). A new EOR technology: Gas alternating gas injection. Journal of Earth Energy Engineering, 8(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.25299/jeee.2019.vol8(1).2354

Schneider, C., & Shi, W. (2005). A miscible WAG project using horizontal wells in a mature, offshore, carbonate Middle East reservoir. In SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, SPE-93606. SPE. https://doi.org/10.2118/93606-MS

Smith, J., et al. (2018). Artificial neural network-based predictive modeling for WAG injection optimization. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 162, 123–1.

Song, Y., Sung, W., Jang, Y., & Jung, W. (2020). Application of an artificial neural network in predicting the effectiveness of trapping mechanisms on CO₂ sequestration in saline aquifers. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 98, 103042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103042

Sulak, R. M. (1991). Ekofisk Field: The first 20 years. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 43(10), 1265–1271. https://doi.org/10.2118/20773-PA

Sun, Q., Ampomah, W., You, J., Cather, M., & Balch, R. (2021). Practical CO₂-WAG field operational designs using hybrid numerical–machine-learning approaches. Energies, 14(4), 1055. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14041055

van Assen, M., Muscogiuri, E., Tessarin, G., & De Cecco, C. N. (2022). Artificial intelligence: A century-old story. In C. N. De Cecco, M. van Assen, & T. Leiner (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in cardiothoracic imaging (Contemporary Medical Imaging). Humana, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92087-6_1

Van, S. L., & Chon, B. H. (2017). Evaluating the critical performances of a CO₂-enhanced oil recovery process using artificial neural network models. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 157, 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.07.034

Wei, J., Zhou, J., Li, J., Zhou, X., Dong, W., & Cheng, Z. (2021). Experimental study on oil recovery mechanism of CO₂ associated enhancing oil recovery methods in low permeability reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 197, 108047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108047

Wojnicki, M., Lubaś, J., Warnecki, M., Kuśnierczyk, J., & Szuflita, S. (2020). Experimental studies of immiscible high-nitrogen natural gas WAG injection efficiency in mixed-wet carbonate reservoir. Energies, 13(9), 2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092346

Yang, Z., Yue, X., Shao, M., Yang, Y., & Yan, R. (2021). Monitoring of flooding characteristics with different methane gas injection methods in low-permeability heterogeneous cores. Energy & Fuels, 35(4), 3208–3218. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03594

Yazdani, B., Vaziri, P., & Sedaee Sola, B. (2022). Performance of water injection and CO₂ injection into oil reservoirs based on field data: Using ANNs to predict in the selected scenario. Journal of Petroleum Science and Technology, 12(3), 2–11.

You, J., Ampomah, W., & Sun, Q. (2020a). Co-optimizing water-alternating-carbon dioxide injection projects using a machine learning assisted computational framework. Applied Energy, 279, 115695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115695

You, J., Ampomah, W., & Sun, Q. (2020b). Development and application of a machine learning based multi-objective optimization workflow for CO₂-EOR projects. Fuel, 264, 116758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116758

Yousef, A. M., Kavousi Ghahfarokhi, P., Alnuaimi, M., & Alatrach, Y. (2020). Predictive data analytics application for enhanced oil recovery in a mature field in the Middle East. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 47(2), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(20)60056-8

Zarringhalam, A., Alizadeh, M., Rafiee, J., & Moshirfarahi, M. M. (2016). Neural network prediction model of three-phase fluids flow in heterogeneous porous media using scaling analysis. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 138, 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.09.023

Zhang, G. P., Patuwo, B. E., & Hu, M. Y. (2001). A simulation study of artificial neural networks for nonlinear time-series forecasting. Computers & Operations Research, 28(4), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00123-9

Zhang, J., Feng, Q., Wang, S., Zhang, X., & Wang, S. (2016). Estimation of CO₂-brine interfacial tension using an artificial neural network. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 107, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2015.08.010

Zhong, Z., Carr, T. R., Wu, X., & Wang, G. (2019). Application of a convolutional neural network in permeability prediction: A case study in the Jacksonburg-Stringtown oil field, West Virginia, USA. Geophysics, 84(6), B363–B373. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0588.1

How to Cite

Saadallah Ogaidi, A. R., Wang, X., & Samba, M. A. (2025). Artificial neural network applications for optimizing water alternating gas injection: a comprehensive review. CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología Y Futuro, 15(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.29047/01225383.1756